Difference between revisions of "Sphinx gotchas"
(separate Sphinx/Napoleon headings) |
(→Napoleon: add gotcha: available docstring sections) |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
== Napoleon == | == Napoleon == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Docstring sections === | ||
+ | |||
+ | See the [http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/ext/napoleon.html#docstring-sections list of docstring sections] supported by Napoleon. Everything else will ''not'' be typeset with a dedicated heading, you will have to do so explicitly using reStructuredText markup. | ||
+ | |||
[[Category:Guidelines]] | [[Category:Guidelines]] | ||
[[Category:Software development]] | [[Category:Software development]] | ||
[[Category:Python]] | [[Category:Python]] |
Revision as of 13:23, 7 September 2017
Here is a list of common gotchas when formatting Python docstrings for Sphinx and the Napoleon style.
Sphinx
Lists
All sorts of lists require an empty line before the first bullet and after the last one, to be properly interpreted as list. No indentation is required for list elements w.r.t. surrounding text, and line continuations should be indented like the first character after the bullet
Good:
this is some text preceding the list - foo - bar - baz - this is a rather long-ish paragraph inserted in the list with line continuation - qux this is some text following the list
Bad:
this is a bad example that will not be interpreted as a list preceding text - foo - bar - baz following text
Good:
surrounding text - foo - nested lists also requires empty lines - inner list 1 - inner list 2 - outer list continues here surrounding text
Bad:
- foo - nested lists also requires empty lines - inner list 1 - inner list 2 - outer list continues here
Verbatim source code
Verbatim code blocks, e.g., for code examples, requires double colon at the end of a line, then an empty line, and then the code block itself, indented:
a nice example of python code follows:: def foo(bar, baz): qux = bar + baz return qux here we can restart text flow
Inline code samples use double backquotes, and not single ones.
Good:
you have to instantiate the method ``def foo(bar): pass`` in order to use this abstract class
Bad:
you have to instantiate the method `def foo(bar): pass` in order to use this abstract class
Napoleon
Docstring sections
See the list of docstring sections supported by Napoleon. Everything else will not be typeset with a dedicated heading, you will have to do so explicitly using reStructuredText markup.