Difference between revisions of "Google Season of Docs 2019"

From Software Heritage Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
** our [https://wiki.softwareheritage.org/ public wiki]
 
** our [https://wiki.softwareheritage.org/ public wiki]
 
** our [https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/ documentation index]
 
** our [https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/ documentation index]
 +
* Technical setup:
 +
** Create an account on our [https://forge.softwareheritage.org development forge]
 +
** Familiarize yourself with our [[Code review in Phabricator|code review workflow]]
 +
** Make a simple change to the documentation of any one of our [https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/ software components] and submit it as a [https://forge.softwareheritage.org/differential/ diff] for code review, following the above workflow. Feel free to submit any patch you think it might be useful.
  
 
=== What to include in your application ===
 
=== What to include in your application ===

Revision as of 12:55, 22 April 2019

TODO WORK IN PROGRESS — mostly a copy of Google Summer of Code 2019 for now, please come back later

GSoDLogo.png

General information

This page is the central point of information for Software Heritage participation into the Google Season of Docs program.

Google Summer of Code is a program where Google pays technical writers stipends to work on free software projects such as Software Heritage. Each writer works with mentors from the community to complete a documentation project.

I want to participate as a technical writer

Great!, we are very glad for your interest in contributing to Software Heritage and we are looking forward to work together.

Prerequisites

The following prerequisites apply to Software Heritage GSoD projects:

  • Sphinx is our documentation system of choice, you should be familiar with it to apply. In particular, we generally use reStructuredText markup and (for API references) Python docstrings with the Napoleon style
  • Git is our version control system of choice, you should be familiar with it to apply
  • additional prerequisites depend on the project you will work on; check project descriptions for details

Before you apply

Here are the steps you should follow before applying, to make sure you have a general idea of the current state of Software Heritage technical documentation:

What to include in your application

Make sure that your application includes the following information:

  • Describe the specific project you want to work on. What do you want to achieve? Why is it important? Why is it useful for Software Heritage? The project might be one of the project ideas that we have prepared below, or something else entirely that you want to contribute to Software Heritage. Your pet peeve, surprise us!
  • Detail your work plan: a brief description of how you plan to go about your project, including a list of deliverables and a timeline of when do you expect them to be available.
  • Include a reference to the diff you submitted before applying (see the "Before you apply" section above).

Ideas list

Below you can find a list of project ideas that are good options for a reasonably sized GSoC project. They are just suggestion though, don't feel obliged to pick one of them if there is nothing that fits your taste and abilities. Feel free to propose something else that you are excited about and that contributes to improve the Software Heritage archive: we will be happy to consider it!

Increase archive coverage

Software Heritage aims to archive all publicly available software source code. We naturally started with the place where most of the software is easily available today: git repositories on GitHub.

As Software Heritage grows, we're incrementally increasing archive coverage by expanding the sources from which we archive software; a list of currently crawled sources is listed on the main archive page. As you can see there, we have already built ways of archiving Mercurial repositories, Debian packages, PyPI bundles, and more.

Further expansions of archive coverage are very suitable GSoC project.

Practically, to expand archive coverage two kinds of software components need to be implemented: listers and loaders.

Listers are components that crawl the APIs of software forges (e.g., Bitbucket, Gitorious, Sourceforge, ...) or package managers (a larges list is maintained by Libraries.io) and return a list of the software available in it. See the official listers documentation for more details.

Loaders take a bundle of software (tarball, Git repository, Python package, ...) and load it into Software Heritage, by adapting it so that it matches the archive data model.

While listers answer questions like "what are all the repositories available on npm.org?", a loader addresses the "how do I load the NPM package I downloaded into Software Heritage?" problem.

Writing a missing lister or a loader is a great way to contribute to expand the coverage of the Software Heritage archive! Feel free to propose the implementation of one (or several!) listers or loaders that are currently missing. For inspiration you can check out our Suggestion box for code to archive, or propose your favorite missing forge or package repository.

Mine information from archived content

In addition to archival, Software Heritage indexes the retrieved source code artifacts, to enable semantic searches on the archive and scientific research.

Indexing can happen at the individual file-level (e.g., detect the programming language the file is written in or the license declared in its header), or at more coarse grained granularity (e.g., what metadata are declared for the most recently archived version of a given project).

A number of indexes are currently supported, such as:

  • file level mining:
    • MIME type detection (using libmagic)
    • license detection (using FOSSology/nomossa)
    • language detection (using Pygments)
    • ctags extraction (using universal-ctags)
  • project level mining:
    • Ruby gemspec metadata
    • Python PKG-INFO metadata
    • Maven pom.xml metadata
    • NPM package.json metadata

Writing additional indexers that extract more information from archived source code is welcome and would constitute a suitable GSoC project.

Name the kind of data mining you want to do!

For inspiration you can have a look at Libraries.io, as most package formats/package managers support dedicated ways of expressing metadata and we only support a small number of them up-to-now. But do not restrict your ambition to those, any kind of data extraction/mining you want to do on the archive could work.

Improve and extend the archive Web UI

As you probably know already, The Software Heritage archive can be browsed on the Web. The code powering that interface is a Django application that also implements a Web API.

Several improvements are possible on the archive Web interface and would make great GSoC projects, some ideas to whet your appetite:

  • improve navigation on mobile devices and browsers
  • add new source code search criteria and improve the search interface
  • add developer-oriented features, e.g., source file history, blame/praise interface, in-browser edit (with patch download), ...
  • improve accessibility
  • add missing API endpoints (name your pet peeves!)
  • add end to end tests using Selenium

Research internships

For the more research-inclined students, we also maintain a separate list of Internships. Any topic there is also a viable GSoC project.

Contact

GSoC students are encouraged to get in touch with the Software Heritage community using the standard development communication channels, i.e.:

See our development information page for more details.

Timeline

See the official Google Summer of Code timeline.